We Asked 22 U.S. Judges About The Most Scientifically Ambitious Punishment They Ever Gave To A Shoplifter
December 15, 2015
We spoke with 22 judges from all over the country and asked them one simple question: What is the most scientifically ambitious punishment you’ve ever given to a convicted shoplifter?
1. Julian Feldman, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of Alabama – “What exactly are you asking me? I don’t understand the question.”
2. Phillip Rogers, First Circuit Court Judge, Hawaii – “When I sentence a convict, I’m focused on fairness, not on expanding the boundaries of science.”
3. Jim Zaller, District Court Judge, Idaho – “I think you might be a bit confused about what a judge’s job actually is.”
4. Sarah Tappish, District Court Judge, Kentucky – “I’ve only ever sentenced shoplifters to fines and probation.”
5. Zed Nichols, County Judge, Florida – “Shoplifting really isn’t considered a very serious crime, so judges don’t really go overboard with the sentencing.”
6. Willa Kirkman, Associate Justice, Arizona Supreme Court – “I’ve never tried to give a scientifically ambitious sentence to a shoplifter.”
7. Tim Bronson, District Court Judge, Delaware – “I’m not sure I understand what you mean.”
8. Kelly Greene, Associate Justice, Connecticut Supreme Court – “There’s a whole set of laws that dictate what sorts of sentences you’re allowed to give to shoplifters. I try to follow those guidelines pretty closely.”
9. Valerie Morrison, 10th District Judge, New York – “I once sentenced a 14-year-old shoplifter to a punishment that forced us to reconsider what mankind was capable of. Utilizing a radical medical procedure I developed over the course of 15 years of intense research, I cryogenically froze the shoplifter from the neck down while leaving his head unfrozen, thus allowing his head to age while the rest of his body remained frozen in time. I released him 70 years later, and he was a 14-year-old boy with the head of an 84-year-old man. He looked in the mirror and he screamed and screamed. ‘How am I possible?’ he cried. He had become a chimeric monstrosity—a Minotaur of Time, with the head of old age and the body of youth. Contemporary scientists still puzzle over how I was able to engineer this beast of justice, for in punishing this shoplifter, I became a master over Time itself! That boy will never shoplift again, and it’s all because I had the courage to dream beyond the boundaries of the infinite and voyage beyond the realm of the possible.”
10. Wyatt Patterson, 8th District Associate Judge, Maryland – “I rarely give shoplifters anything more severe than a $150 fine.”
11. Camilla Reyna, District Judge, Puerto Rico – “What are you talking about?”
12. Anna Porter, Associate Justice, Rhode Island Superior Court – “No! I would never do something like that.”
13. James Mitchell, Judge, South Carolina Court of Appeals – “I don’t know what you mean by ‘most scientifically ambitious.’”
14. John Roberts, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of the United States – “What?”
15. Barbara Lynn Terra, Chief Judge, Alaska Court of Appeals – “None of my sentences involve any science.”
16. Lucille Janger, Justice, Supreme Court of Ohio – “Sentencing is dictated by the law, not by the scientific ambitions of the judge.”
17. Marcus Wilhelm, District IV Judge, Wisconsin Court of Appeals – “In my courtroom, shoplifting gets you a fine at worst.”
18. Augustus Stewart, Fifth District Judge, Utah – “I once sent a shoplifter to jail for 48 hours, but that was because he was a repeat offender. I’ve never passed down a sentence that I would call scientifically ambitious.”
19. Rex T. Evans, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania – “I once had to sentence a woman who had been caught shoplifting on three separate occasions. Against the laws of God, Nature, and Science alike, I genetically engineered a dog that could shout ‘You stole!’ that would follow her around screaming this at her for the rest of her life. To this day, that talking dog, my horrible creation, follows that shoplifter around incessantly shouting ‘You stole! You stole! You stole!’ Because of my terrible experiments, that thief will never forget her crimes. I gave a dog the gift of speech. I’m a genius and a monster. God forgive me.”
20. Martin Hopefield, Fourth Circuit Judge, Arkansas – “I’m afraid I don’t understand your question.”
21. Edna Wallace, Second District Juvenile Court Associate Judge, Utah – “Shoplifters only really get fines or very light jail time.”
22. Jeffrey Davis, Associate Justice, South Dakota Supreme Court – “I’m not sure what you mean.”
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional cookies
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional cookies
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.